Strongly polynomial efficient approximation scheme for segmentation

Nikolaj Tatti

doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2018.09.007

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1805.11170

Strongly polynomial efficient approximation scheme for segmentation

Nikolaj Tatti

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Partitioning a sequence of length $n$ into $k$ coherent segments (Seg) is one of the classic optimization problems. As long as the optimization criterion is additive, Seg can be solved exactly in $O(n^2k)$ time using a classic dynamic program. Due to the quadratic term, computing the exact segmentation may be too expensive for long sequences, which has led to development of approximate solutions. We consider an existing estimation scheme that computes $(1 + \epsilon)$ approximation in polylogarithmic time. We augment this algorithm, making it strongly polynomial. We do this by first solving a slightly different segmentation problem (MaxSeg), where the quality of the segmentation is the maximum penalty of an individual segment. By using this solution to initialize the estimation scheme, we are able to obtain a strongly polynomial algorithm. In addition, we consider a cumulative version of Seg, where we are asked to discover the optimal segmentation for each prefix of the input sequence. We propose a strongly polynomial algorithm that yields $(1 + \epsilon)$ approximation in $O(nk^2 / \epsilon)$ time. Finally, we consider a cumulative version of MaxSeg, and show that we can solve the problem in $O(nk \log k)$ time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS cs.AI

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Nikolaj Tatti. 2018-05-28. Strongly polynomial efficient approximation scheme for segmentation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2018.09.007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗