arXiv · 1805.12171
Comment on "Past of a quantum particle revisited"
Abstract
The recent criticism of Vaidman's propsal for the analysis of the past of a particle in the nested interferometer is refuted. It is shown that the definition of the past of the particle adopted by Englert et al. [Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)] is applicable only to a tiny fraction of photons in the interferometer which indeed exhibit different behaviour. Their proof that all pre- and postselected particles behave this way, i.e. follow a continuous trajectory, does not hold, because it relies on the assumption that it is intended to prove.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Uri Peleg, Lev Vaidman. 2018-05-30. Comment on "Past of a quantum particle revisited". https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.99.026103
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.