Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1806.01104

Consolidating the innovative concepts towards Exascale computing for Co-Design of Co-Applications ll: Co-Design Automation - Workload Characterization

Dhanasekar·Anirudh Seshadri·Sudharshan Srinivasan·Suryanarayanan·Akash Sridhar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many-core co-design is a complex task in which application complexity design space, heterogeneous many-core architecture design space, parallel programming language design space, simulator design space and optimizer design space should get integrated through a binding process and these design spaces, an ensemble of what is called many-core co-design spaces. It is indispensable to build a co-design automation process to dominate over the co-design complexity to cut down the turnaround time. The co-design automation is frame worked to comprehend the dependencies across the many-core co-design spaces and devise the logic behind these interdependencies using a set of algorithms. The software modules of these algorithms and the rest from the many-core co-design spaces interact to crop up the power-performance optimized heterogeneous many-core architecture specific for the simultaneous execution of co applications without space-time sharing. It is essential that such co-design automation has a built-in user-customizable workload generator to benchmark the emerging many-core architecture. This customizability benefits the generation of complex workloads with the desired computation complexity, communication complexity, control flow complexity, and locality of reference, specified under a distribution and established on quantitative models. In addition, the customizable workload model aids the generation of what is called computational and communication surges. None of the current day benchmark suites encompasses applications and kernels that can match the attributes of customizable workload model proposed in this paper. Aforementioned concepts are exemplified in, the case study supported by simulation results gathered from the simulator.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Dhanasekar, Anirudh Seshadri, Sudharshan Srinivasan, Suryanarayanan, Akash Sridhar. 2018-04-29. Consolidating the innovative concepts towards Exascale computing for Co-Design of Co-Applications ll: Co-Design Automation - Workload Characterization. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01104

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗