SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1806.06323

Approximate Submodular Functions and Performance Guarantees

Abstract

We consider the problem of maximizing non-negative non-decreasing set functions. Although most of the recent work focus on exploiting submodularity, it turns out that several objectives we encounter in practice are not submodular. Nonetheless, often we leverage the greedy algorithms used in submodular functions to determine a solution to the non-submodular functions. Hereafter, we propose to address the original problem by \emph{approximating} the non-submodular function and analyze the incurred error, as well as the performance trade-offs. To quantify the approximation error, we introduce a novel concept of $\delta$-approximation of a function, which we used to define the space of submodular functions that lie within an approximation error. We provide necessary conditions on the existence of such $\delta$-approximation functions, which might not be unique. Consequently, we characterize this subspace which we refer to as \emph{region of submodularity}. Furthermore, submodular functions are known to lead to different sub-optimality guarantees, so we generalize those dependencies upon a $\delta$-approximation into the notion of \emph{greedy curvature}. Finally, we used this latter notion to simplify some of the existing results and efficiently (i.e., linear complexity) determine tightened bounds on the sub-optimality guarantees using objective functions commonly used in practical setups and validate them using real data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gaurav Gupta, Sergio Pequito, Paul Bogdan. 2018-06-17. Approximate Submodular Functions and Performance Guarantees. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06323

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS