SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1806.07356

Deterministic $O(1)$-Approximation Algorithms to 1-Center Clustering with Outliers

Abstract

The 1-center clustering with outliers problem asks about identifying a prototypical robust statistic that approximates the location of a cluster of points. Given some constant $0 < \alpha < 1$ and $n$ points such that $\alpha n$ of them are in some (unknown) ball of radius $r,$ the goal is to compute a ball of radius $O(r)$ that also contains $\alpha n$ points. This problem can be formulated with the points in a normed vector space such as $\mathbb{R}^d$ or in a general metric space. The problem has a simple randomized solution: a randomly selected point is a correct solution with constant probability, and its correctness can be verified in linear time. However, the deterministic complexity of this problem was not known. In this paper, for any $\ell_p$ vector space, we show an $O(nd)$-time solution with a ball of radius $O(r)$ for a fixed $\alpha > \frac{1}{2},$ and for any normed vector space, we show an $O(nd)$-time solution with a ball of radius $O(r)$ when $\alpha > \frac{1}{2}$ as well as an $O (nd \log^{(k)}(n))$-time solution with a ball of radius $O(r)$ for all $\alpha > 0, k \in \mathbb{N},$ where $\log^{(k)}(n)$ represents the $k$th iterated logarithm, assuming distance computation and vector space operations take $O(d)$ time. For an arbitrary metric space, we show for any $C \in \mathbb{N}$ an $O(n^{1+1/C})$-time solution that finds a ball of radius $2Cr,$ assuming distance computation between any pair of points takes $O(1)$-time. Moreover, this algorithm is optimal for general metric spaces, as we show that for any fixed $\alpha, C,$ there is no $o(n^{1+1/C})$-query and thus no $o(n^{1+1/C})$-time solution that deterministically finds a ball of radius $2Cr$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Shyam Narayanan. 2018-06-19. Deterministic $O(1)$-Approximation Algorithms to 1-Center Clustering with Outliers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07356

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS