SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.01494

A complete system of deduction for Sigma formulas

Abstract

The Sigma formulas of the language of arithmetic express semidecidable relations on the natural numbers. More generally, whenever a totality of objects is regarded as incomplete, the Sigma formulas express relations that are witnessed in a completed portion of that totality when they hold. In this sense, the Sigma formulas are more concrete semantically than other first-order formulas. We describe a system of deduction that uses only Sigma formulas. Each axiom, an implication between two Sigma formulas, is implemented as a rewriting rule for subformulas. We exhibit a complete class of logical axioms for this system, and we observe that a distributive law distinguishes classical reasoning from intuitionistic reasoning in this setting. Skolem's theory PRA of primitive recursive arithmetic can be formulated in our deductive system. In Skolem's system, free variables are universally quantified implicitly, but in our formulation, free variables act as parameters to the deduction. In this sense, our formulation is more explicitly finitistic. Furthermore, most of our results are themselves finistic, being theorems of PRA. In particular, appending our main theorem to a celebrated chain of reductions from reverse mathematics, we find that an implication of Sigma formulas is derivable in WKL_0 if and only if there is a deduction from the antecedent to the consequent in our formulation of PRA.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andre Kornell. 2018-07-04. A complete system of deduction for Sigma formulas. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01494

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO