SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.04802

A Faster Algorithm for Minimum-Cost Bipartite Matching in Minor-Free Graphs

Abstract

We give an $\tilde{O}(n^{7/5} \log (nC))$-time algorithm to compute a minimum-cost maximum cardinality matching (optimal matching) in $K_h$-minor free graphs with $h=O(1)$ and integer edge weights having magnitude at most $C$. This improves upon the $\tilde{O}(n^{10/7}\log{C})$ algorithm of Cohen et al. [SODA 2017] and the $O(n^{3/2}\log (nC))$ algorithm of Gabow and Tarjan [SIAM J. Comput. 1989]. For a graph with $m$ edges and $n$ vertices, the well-known Hungarian Algorithm computes a shortest augmenting path in each phase in $O(m)$ time, yielding an optimal matching in $O(mn)$ time. The Hopcroft-Karp [SIAM J. Comput. 1973], and Gabow-Tarjan [SIAM J. Comput. 1989] algorithms compute, in each phase, a maximal set of vertex-disjoint shortest augmenting paths (for appropriately defined costs) in $O(m)$ time. This reduces the number of phases from $n$ to $O(\sqrt{n})$ and the total execution time to $O(m\sqrt{n})$. In order to obtain our speed-up, we relax the conditions on the augmenting paths and iteratively compute, in each phase, a set of carefully selected augmenting paths that are not restricted to be shortest or vertex-disjoint. As a result, our algorithm computes substantially more augmenting paths in each phase, reducing the number of phases from $O(\sqrt{n})$ to $O(n^{2/5})$. By using small vertex separators, the execution of each phase takes $\tilde{O}(m)$ time on average. For planar graphs, we combine our algorithm with efficient shortest path data structures to obtain a minimum-cost perfect matching in $\tilde{O}(n^{6/5} \log{(nC)})$ time. This improves upon the recent $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3}\log{(nC)})$ time algorithm by Asathulla et al. [SODA 2018].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Nathaniel Lahn, Sharath Raghvendra. 2018-07-12. A Faster Algorithm for Minimum-Cost Bipartite Matching in Minor-Free Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04802

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS