SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.08144

Faster Exact and Approximate Algorithms for $k$-Cut

Abstract

In the $k$-cut problem, we are given an edge-weighted graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and have to remove a set of edges with minimum total weight so that $G$ has at least $k$ connected components. The current best algorithms are an $O(n^{(2-o(1))k})$ randomized algorithm due to Karger and Stein, and an $\smash{\tilde{O}}(n^{2k})$ deterministic algorithm due to Thorup. Moreover, several $2$-approximation algorithms are known for the problem (due to Saran and Vazirani, Naor and Rabani, and Ravi and Sinha). It has remained an open problem to (a) improve the runtime of exact algorithms, and (b) to get better approximation algorithms. In this paper we show an $O(k^{O(k)} \, n^{(2\omega/3 + o(1))k})$-time algorithm for $k$-cut. Moreover, we show an $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm that runs in time $O((k/\epsilon)^{O(k)} \,n^{k + O(1)})$, and a $1.81$-approximation in fixed-parameter time $O(2^{O(k^2)}\,\text{poly}(n))$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anupam Gupta, Euiwoong Lee, Jason Li. 2018-07-21. Faster Exact and Approximate Algorithms for $k$-Cut. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08144

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS