SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1807.08478

Batch Sparse Recovery, or How to Leverage the Average Sparsity

Abstract

We introduce a \emph{batch} version of sparse recovery, where the goal is to report a sequence of vectors $A_1',\ldots,A_m' \in \mathbb{R}^n$ that estimate unknown signals $A_1,\ldots,A_m \in \mathbb{R}^n$ using a few linear measurements, each involving exactly one signal vector, under an assumption of \emph{average sparsity}. More precisely, we want to have \newline $(1) \;\;\; \sum_{j \in [m]}{\|A_j- A_j'\|_p^p} \le C \cdot \min \Big\{ \sum_{j \in [m]}{\|A_j - A_j^*\|_p^p} \Big\}$ for predetermined constants $C \ge 1$ and $p$, where the minimum is over all $A_1^*,\ldots,A_m^*\in\mathbb{R}^n$ that are $k$-sparse on average. We assume $k$ is given as input, and ask for the minimal number of measurements required to satisfy $(1)$. The special case $m=1$ is known as stable sparse recovery and has been studied extensively. We resolve the question for $p =1$ up to polylogarithmic factors, by presenting a randomized adaptive scheme that performs $\tilde{O}(km)$ measurements and with high probability has output satisfying $(1)$, for arbitrarily small $C > 1$. Finally, we show that adaptivity is necessary for every non-trivial scheme.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandr Andoni, Lior Kamma, Robert Krauthgamer, Eric Price. 2018-07-23. Batch Sparse Recovery, or How to Leverage the Average Sparsity. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08478

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS