SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1809.04519

A Simple Elementary Proof of P=NP based on the Relational Model of E. F. Codd

Abstract

The P versus NP problem is studied under the relational model of E. F. Codd. I found that the term "complete configuration" is unnecessary and harmful in computational complexity theory because of excessive symbol redundancy. For an input, its valid sequences of complete configurations are normalized into a relational model of shared trichoices with no redundancy. To simplify the problem, a polynomial time nondeterministic Turing machine is polynomially reduced to a periodic machine, which only reverses its tape head displacement at the tape ends. By enumerating all the O(p(n)) shared trichoices, a polynomial time p(n) periodic machine is simulated in time O((p(n))^4) under logarithmic cost. A simple elementary proof of P=NP is obtained.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Aizhong Li. 2018-09-12. A Simple Elementary Proof of P=NP based on the Relational Model of E. F. Codd. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.04519

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC