Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1810.00775

Modular structures and extended-modular-group-structures after Hecke pairs

Orchidea Maria Lecian
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The simplices and the complexes arsing form the grading of the fundamental (desymmetrized) domain of arithmetical groups and non-arithmetical groups, as well as their extended (symmetrized) ones are described also for oriented manifolds in dim greater than 2. The conditions for the definition of fibers are summarized after Hamiltonian analysis, the latters can in some cases be reduced to those for sections for graded groups, such as the Picard groups and the Vinberg group.The cases for which modular structures rather than modular-groupstructure measures can be analyzed for non-arithmetic groups, i.e. also in the cases for which Gelfand triples (rigged spaces) have to be substituted by Hecke couples, as, for Hecke groups, the existence of intertwining operators after the calculation of the second commutator within the Haar measures for the operators of the correspondingly-generated C-[star] algebras is straightforward. The results hold also for (also non-abstract) groups with measures on (manifold) boundaries. The Poincar\'e invariance of the representation of Wigner-Bargmann (spin 1/2) particles is analyzed within the Fock-space interaction representation. The well-posed-ness of initial conditions and boundary ones for the connected (families of) equations is discussed. As an example, Picard-related equations can be classified according to the genus of the modular curve(s) attached to the solutions(s). From the Hamiltonian analysis, further results in the contraction of the congruence (extended sub-)groups for non-arithmetical groups for the construction of tori is provided as an alternative to the free diffeomorphism group. In addition, the presence of Poincar\'e complexes is found compatible with non-local interactions, i.e. both lattices interactions or spin-like ones.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Orchidea Maria Lecian. 2018-10-01. Modular structures and extended-modular-group-structures after Hecke pairs. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1194/1/012067

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗