SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.02202

Inverting the 10-Coin Triangle Puzzle and Other Shapes: A New General Solution

Abstract

This puzzle, often called the "Reverse the Triangle Puzzle," appears regularly in puzzle books. Four rows consisting of 1 coin in row 1, 2 coins in row 2, 3 coins in row 3, and 4 coins in row 4 form the shape of a triangle. What is the fewest number of coins you need to move to flip the triangle 180 degrees so that it points in the opposite direction? In the case of 4 rows, it requires moving just 3 coins. The general solution for any number of rows can be calculated by dividing the number of coins by 3 and ignoring any remainder. A triangle of 4 rows has 10 coins, so 10/3 = 3.333 leads to 3 moves. However, this calculation is fairly nonintuitive as to why it works and requires an inelegant maneuver of periodically discarding a remainder. In this paper, we present a more intuitive formula that always calculates the answer directly and never produces a decimal answer. Further, we explore inverting other shapes (e.g., rhombus) and find an interesting connection to the formula for triangles.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tony McCaffrey, Oscar Atwill. 2018-10-03. Inverting the 10-Coin Triangle Puzzle and Other Shapes: A New General Solution. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02202

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO