Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1810.02339

A new look at the Helmholtz equation: Lefschetz thimbles and the einbein action

Zachary Guralnik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Picard-Lefschetz theory is applied to solutions of the Helmholtz equation, formulated in terms of sums of integrals of a proper-time, or `einbein', wave function $\Psi(\Lambda) = \exp(i\mathbb S(\Lambda))$ along complex contours bounded by essential singularities of $\Psi$. There is a one to one map between steepest descent paths connecting essential singularities and real or complex eigenrays. Residues of finite $\Lambda$ poles of $\mathbb S(\Lambda)$ are shown to vanish at spatial points corresponding to sources, provided that the pole bounds only one steepest descent path. If the sum includes two such paths, with one beginning and the other ending at the same pole, points of vanishing residue are not sources, but are argued to be the locus on which caustic curves may have singularities such as cusp points. The map between $\mathbb S$ and the generating function in the Thom--Arnold classification of catastrophes is discussed. Monodromies of the solution set with respect to complexified parameters defining the index of refraction, or spatial endpoints of Green's functions, are trivially determined from the singularities of $\mathbb S(\Lambda)$. We construct a variant of a Laurent series expansion of $\mathbb S$ about a pole at finite $\Lambda$. Expressions for the coefficients of each order in this expansion can often be given exactly. Based on the Laurent series expansion, we propose a variation of a Pad\'e approximant for $\mathbb S$, with the intent of capturing additional poles and the associated cusp caustics which are not visible in the Laurent series expansion.

Explore related subjects

math-phhep-thmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zachary Guralnik. 2018-10-04. A new look at the Helmholtz equation: Lefschetz thimbles and the einbein action. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02339

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗