SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.03792

A Note on Max $k$-Vertex Cover: Faster FPT-AS, Smaller Approximate Kernel and Improved Approximation

Abstract

In Maximum $k$-Vertex Cover (Max $k$-VC), the input is an edge-weighted graph $G$ and an integer $k$, and the goal is to find a subset $S$ of $k$ vertices that maximizes the total weight of edges covered by $S$. Here we say that an edge is covered by $S$ iff at least one of its endpoints lies in $S$. We present an FPT approximation scheme (FPT-AS) that runs in $(1/\epsilon)^{O(k)} poly(n)$ time for the problem, which improves upon Gupta et al.'s $(k/\epsilon)^{O(k)} poly(n)$-time FPT-AS [SODA'18, FOCS'18]. Our algorithm is simple: just use brute force to find the best $k$-vertex subset among the $O(k/\epsilon)$ vertices with maximum weighted degrees. Our algorithm naturally yields an efficient approximate kernelization scheme of $O(k/\epsilon)$ vertices; previously, an $O(k^5/\epsilon^2)$-vertex approximate kernel is only known for the unweighted version of Max $k$-VC [Lokshtanov et al., STOC'17]. Interestingly, this has an application outside of parameterized complexity: using our approximate kernelization as a preprocessing step, we can directly apply Raghavendra and Tan's SDP-based algorithm for 2SAT with cardinality constraint [SODA'12] to give an $0.92$-approximation for Max $k$-VC in polynomial time. This improves upon Feige and Langberg's algorithm [J. Algorithms'01] which yields $(0.75 + \delta)$-approximation for some (unspecified) constant $\delta > 0$. We also consider the minimization version (Min $k$-VC), where the goal is to minimize the total weight of edges covered by $S$. We provide an FPT-AS for Min $k$-VC with similar running time of $(1/\epsilon)^{O(k)} poly(n)$, which again improves on a $(k/\epsilon)^{O(k)} poly(n)$-time FPT-AS of Gupta et al. On the other hand, we show that there is unlikely a polynomial size approximate kernelization for Min $k$-VC for any factor less than two.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Pasin Manurangsi. 2018-10-09. A Note on Max $k$-Vertex Cover: Faster FPT-AS, Smaller Approximate Kernel and Improved Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03792

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS