SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.05198

On Riemanns Nachlass for Analytic Number Theory: A translation of Siegel's Uber

Abstract

In 1859 Riemann (1826-1866) published his only paper on number theory. In this eight-page paper he obtained a formula for the number of primes less than or equal to a real number x, and revealed the deep connection between the distribution of primes and the zeros of an analytic function now called the Riemann Zeta Function. In the early 1930's two related unpublished results from 1859 were found in Riemanns very rough notes by the great twentieth century mathematician and scholar, Carl Ludwig Siegel (1896-1981). In his 1932 paper "Uber Riemanns Nachlass zur analytischen Zahlentheorie"("On Riemann's Nachlass for Analytic Number Theory") Siegel presents these unpublished results and gives derivations he found in Riemann's notes. The first is an asymptotic development, now called the Riemann-Siegel formula, for efficiently computing values of the Riemann Zeta Function. The second is a new integral representation of the zeta function. These results had not been rediscovered seventy years after Riemann. Thus, in 1932 the importance of Siegel's paper was not only its contribution to the history of mathematics, but also its contribution to current research. Hoping to get some insight into how Siegel spotted and deciphered these gems among Riemann's fragmentary and disordered personnel papers, we decided to look at the 1932 paper. We also wanted to learn how much of the paper is original to Riemann and whether Siegel needed to fill any gaps. Although Siegel's paper is cited whenever the Riemann-Siegel formula is discussed, we were unable the locate an English translation. Despite our limited knowledge of the German language, we have produced a translation of the paper as it appears in volume one of Siegel's collected works.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Eric Barkan, David Sklar. 2018-10-11. On Riemanns Nachlass for Analytic Number Theory: A translation of Siegel's Uber. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.05198

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO