SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.06267

Small Space Stream Summary for Matroid Center

Abstract

In the matroid center problem, which generalizes the $k$-center problem, we need to pick a set of centers that is an independent set of a matroid with rank $r$. We study this problem in streaming, where elements of the ground set arrive in the stream. We first show that any randomized one-pass streaming algorithm that computes a better than $\Delta$-approximation for partition-matroid center must use $\Omega(r^2)$ bits of space, where $\Delta$ is the aspect ratio of the metric and can be arbitrarily large. This shows a quadratic separation between matroid center and $k$-center, for which the Doubling algorithm gives an $8$-approximation using $O(k)$-space and one pass. To complement this, we give a one-pass algorithm for matroid center that stores at most $O(r^2\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon)$ points (viz., stream summary) among which a $(7+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution exists, which can be found by brute force, or a $(17+\varepsilon)$-approximation can be found with an efficient algorithm. If we are allowed a second pass, we can compute a $(3+\varepsilon)$-approximation efficiently; this also achieves almost the known-best approximation ratio (of $3+\varepsilon$) with total running time of $O((nr + r^{3.5})\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon + r^2(\log \Delta)/\varepsilon)$, where $n$ is the number of input points. We also consider the problem of matroid center with $z$ outliers and give a one-pass algorithm that outputs a set of $O((r^2+rz)\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon)$ points that contains a $(15+\varepsilon)$-approximate solution. Our techniques extend to knapsack center and knapsack center with outliers in a straightforward way, and we get algorithms that use space linear in the size of a largest feasible set (as opposed to quadratic space for matroid center).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sagar Kale. 2018-10-15. Small Space Stream Summary for Matroid Center. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.06267

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS