SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.07422

Fast and Longest Rollercoasters

Abstract

For $k\geq 3$, a k-rollercoaster is a sequence of numbers whose every maximal contiguous subsequence, that is increasing or decreasing, has length at least $k$; $3$-rollercoasters are called simply rollercoasters. Given a sequence of distinct numbers, we are interested in computing its maximum-length (not necessarily contiguous) subsequence that is a $k$-rollercoaster. Biedl et al. [ICALP 2018] have shown that each sequence of $n$ distinct real numbers contains a rollercoaster of length at least $\lceil n/2\rceil$ for $n>7$, and that a longest rollercoaster contained in such a sequence can be computed in $O(n\log n)$-time. They have also shown that every sequence of $n\geq (k-1)^2+1$ distinct real numbers contains a $k$-rollercoaster of length at least $\frac{n}{2(k-1)}-\frac{3k}{2}$, and gave an $O(nk\log n)$-time algorithm computing a longest $k$-rollercoaster in a sequence of length $n$. In this paper, we give an $O(nk^2)$-time algorithm computing the length of a longest $k$-rollercoaster contained in a sequence of $n$ distinct real numbers; hence, for constant $k$, our algorithm computes the length of a longest $k$-rollercoaster in optimal linear time. The algorithm can be easily adapted to output the respective $k$-rollercoaster. In particular, this improves the results of Biedl et al. [ICALP 2018], by showing that a longest rollercoaster can be computed in optimal linear time. We also present an algorithm computing the length of a longest $k$-rollercoaster in $O(n \log^2 n)$-time, that is, subquadratic even for large values of $k\leq n$. Again, the rollercoaster can be easily retrieved. Finally, we show an $\Omega(n \log k)$ lower bound for the number of comparisons in any comparison-based algorithm computing the length of a longest $k$-rollercoaster.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Paweł Gawrychowski, Florin Manea, Radosław Serafin. 2018-10-17. Fast and Longest Rollercoasters. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07422

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS