arXiv · 1810.08841
Simple Games versus Weighted Voting Games: Bounding the Critical Threshold Value
Abstract
A simple game $(N,v)$ is given by a set $N$ of $n$ players and a partition of~$2^N$ into a set~$\mathcal{L}$ of losing coalitions~$L$ with value $v(L)=0$ that is closed under taking subsets and a set $\mathcal{W}$ of winning coalitions $W$ with $v(W)=1$. Simple games with $\alpha= \min_{p\geq 0}\max_{W\in {\cal W}, L\in {\cal L}} \frac{p(L)}{p(W)}<1$ are exactly the weighted voting games. We show that $\alpha\leq \frac{1}{4}n$ for every simple game $(N,v)$, confirming the conjecture of Freixas and Kurz (IJGT, 2014). For complete simple games, Freixas and Kurz conjectured that $\alpha=O(\sqrt{n})$. We prove this conjecture up to a $\ln n$ factor. We also prove that for graphic simple games, that is, simple games in which every minimal winning coalition has size~2, computing $\alpha$ is \NP-hard, but polynomial-time solvable if the underlying graph is bipartite. Moreover, we show that for every graphic simple game, deciding if $\alpha 0$.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Frits Hof, Walter Kern, Sascha Kurz, Kanstantsin Pashkovich, Daniël Paulusma. 2018-10-20. Simple Games versus Weighted Voting Games: Bounding the Critical Threshold Value. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-019-01221-6
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.