SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1810.10738

Batch-Parallel Euler Tour Trees

Abstract

The dynamic trees problem is to maintain a forest undergoing edge insertions and deletions while supporting queries for information such as connectivity. There are many existing data structures for this problem, but few of them are capable of exploiting parallelism in the batch-setting, in which large batches of edges are inserted or deleted from the forest at once. In this paper, we demonstrate that the Euler tour tree, an existing sequential dynamic trees data structure, can be parallelized in the batch setting. For a batch of $k$ updates over a forest of $n$ vertices, our parallel Euler tour trees perform $O(k \log (1 + n/k))$ expected work with $O(\log n)$ depth with high probability. Our work bound is asymptotically optimal, and we improve on the depth bound achieved by Acar et al. for the batch-parallel dynamic trees problem. The main building block for parallelizing Euler tour trees is a batch-parallel skip list data structure, which we believe may be of independent interest. Euler tour trees require a sequence data structure capable of joins and splits. Sequentially, balanced binary trees are used, but they are difficult to join or split in parallel. We show that skip lists, on the other hand, support batches of joins or splits of size $k$ over $n$ elements with $O(k \log (1 + n/k))$ work in expectation and $O(\log n)$ depth with high probability. We also achieve the same efficiency bounds for augmented skip lists, which allows us to augment our Euler tour trees to support subtree queries. Our data structures achieve between 67--96x self-relative speedup on 72 cores with hyper-threading on large batch sizes. Our data structures also outperform the fastest existing sequential dynamic trees data structures empirically.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thomas Tseng, Laxman Dhulipala, Guy Blelloch. 2018-10-25. Batch-Parallel Euler Tour Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.10738

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS