Exploring the Equivalence between Dynamic Dataflow Model and Gamma - General Abstract Model for Multiset mAnipulation

Rui R. Mello Junior; Leandro S. Araujo; Tiago A. O. Alves; Leandro A. J. Marzulo; Gabriel A. L. Paillard; Felipe M. G. França

arXiv · 1811.00607

Exploring the Equivalence between Dynamic Dataflow Model and Gamma - General Abstract Model for Multiset mAnipulation

Rui R. Mello Junior·Leandro S. Araujo·Tiago A. O. Alves·Leandro A. J. Marzulo·Gabriel A. L. Paillard·Felipe M. G. França

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

With the increase of the search for computational models where the expression of parallelism occurs naturally, some paradigms arise as options for the next generation of computers. In this context, dynamic Dataflow and Gamma - General Abstract Model for Multiset mAnipulation) - emerge as interesting computational models choices. In the dynamic Dataflow model, operations are performed as soon as their associated operators are available, without rely on a Program Counter to dictate the execution order of instructions. The Gamma paradigm is based on a parallel multiset rewriting scheme. It provides a non-deterministic execution model inspired by an abstract chemical machine metaphor, where operations are formulated as reactions that occur freely among matching elements belonging to the multiset. In this work, equivalence relations between the dynamic Dataflow and Gamma paradigms are exposed and explored, while methods to convert from Dataflow to Gamma paradigm and vice versa are provided. It is shown that vertices and edges of a dynamic Dataflow graph can correspond, respectively, to reactions and multiset elements in the Gamma paradigm. Implementation aspects of execution environments that could be mutually beneficial to both models are also discussed. This work provides the scientific community with the possibility of taking profit of both parallel programming models, contributing with a versatility component to researchers and developers. Finally, it is important to state that, to the best of our knowledge, the similarity relations between both dynamic Dataflow and Gamma models presented here have not been reported in any previous work.

Explore related subjects

cs.DC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Rui R. Mello Junior, Leandro S. Araujo, Tiago A. O. Alves, Leandro A. J. Marzulo, Gabriel A. L. Paillard, Felipe M. G. França. 2018-11-01. Exploring the Equivalence between Dynamic Dataflow Model and Gamma - General Abstract Model for Multiset mAnipulation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00607

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Online Treasure Hunt in Vertex-Permuted Dynamic Rings

We study the problem of treasure hunt by a group of $k \geq 1$ agents in vertex-permuted dynamic rings (VP). In this model, the $n$ vertices remain on a ring but are permuted at each time step. We first show that treasure hunt is impossible for any $k \leq n-3$ agents, if there are no restrictions on the sequence of permutations used in the dynamic ring. We then study the $VP(\delta)$ setting, in which for every pair $i, j$ of vertices, the edge $(i, j)$ is guaranteed to appear within $\delta$ steps. We show that the class $VP(\delta)$ is feasible only for $\delta \geq \left\lceil \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rceil$. For the one-agent case, we show a tight bound of $\Theta(\delta n)$ on the worst-case search time as well as competitive ratio of any online algorithm for treasure hunt, provided $\delta \geq 2n$. We then give an optimal algorithm for $k$ agents, thereby showing that $k$ agents can obtain a speedup of $k$ on the worst-case search time. Finally, in the R-VP setting, in which in every step, the vertices are arranged as a ring according to a random permutation, we show that treasure hunt takes expected $\Theta(n)$ steps against an oblivious adversary and $\Theta(n \log n)$ steps against an adaptive adversary.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

The Computing Channel: How Modulation Programs the Airwaves

Distributed computing and distributed artificial intelligence require frequent exchanges of intermediate results, although many applications need only an aggregate rather than messages from individual devices. Conventional systems recover each message before computing the aggregate, whereas over-the-air computation (OAC) exploits simultaneous transmission to obtain it directly. However, dominant OAC implementations rely on analog signaling, creating a mismatch with finite-precision data and digital communication procedures. This article presents digital function-oriented communication, in which finite-alphabet symbol representations and receiver decisions are jointly designed so that multiple-access superposition encodes the desired function without recovering individual inputs. We introduce its computational-constellation principle, main design approaches, extensions, and implementation challenges. Federated edge learning illustrates how the framework can reduce user-dependent data-bearing resources while operating directly on quantized model updates.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2026

Can AI Remediate Backend Failures Safely? GuardedAct with Blast-Radius-Aware Sandboxing

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising capabilities in generating remediation actions for microservice failures. However, directly executing AI-generated repair actions in production risks cascading collateral damage. We propose GuardedAct, a sandbox-first remediation framework that interposes a blast-radius-aware verification layer between the LLM action generator and the production environment. GuardedAct operates in four phases: (1) ingesting a diagnosis report together with the live system topology and recent telemetry, (2) prompting an LLM to produce a ranked list of candidate remediation actions, (3) simulating each action in a lightweight digital-twin sandbox that estimates the blast radius and assigns a risk label, and (4) enforcing a rollback-confidence gate that auto-executes only low-risk actions while escalating high-risk ones for human review. We evaluate GuardedAct on five fault scenarios injected into the DeathStarBench social-network application. Experimental results show that GuardedAct achieves an overall recovery rate of 87.4% while reducing collateral damage by 79.7% relative to direct LLM execution (from 25.6% to 5.2%), at the cost of a modest sandbox-induced increase in mean time to recovery (approximately 8 s). Ablation studies confirm that each component contributes meaningfully to the safety-speed trade-off.

cs.DC↗