SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1811.04300

Efficiently Approximating Edit Distance Between Pseudorandom Strings

Abstract

We present an algorithm for approximating the edit distance $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ between two strings $x$ and $y$ in time parameterized by the degree to which one of the strings $x$ satisfies a natural pseudorandomness property. The pseudorandomness model is asymmetric in that no requirements are placed on the second string $y$, which may be constructed by an adversary with full knowledge of $x$. We say that $x$ is \emph{$(p, B)$-pseudorandom} if all pairs $a$ and $b$ of disjoint $B$-letter substrings of $x$ satisfy $\operatorname{ed}(a, b) \ge pB$. Given parameters $p$ and $B$, our algorithm computes the edit distance between a $(p, B)$-pseudorandom string $x$ and an arbitrary string $y$ within a factor of $O(1/p)$ in time $\tilde{O}(nB)$, with high probability. Our algorithm is robust in the sense that it can handle a small portion of $x$ being adversarial (i.e., not satisfying the pseudorandomness property). In this case, the algorithm incurs an additive approximation error proportional to the fraction of $x$ which behaves maliciously. The asymmetry of our pseudorandomness model has particular appeal for the case where $x$ is a \emph{source string}, meaning that $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ will be computed for many strings $y$. Suppose that one wishes to achieve an $O(\alpha)$-approximation for each $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ computation, and that $B$ is the smallest block-size for which the string $x$ is $(1/\alpha, B)$-pseudorandom. We show that without knowing $B$ beforehand, $x$ may be preprocessed in time $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5}\sqrt{B})$, so that all future computations of the form $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ may be $O(\alpha)$-approximated in time $\tilde{O}(nB)$. Furthermore, for the special case where only a single $\operatorname{ed}(x, y)$ computation will be performed, we show how to achieve an $O(\alpha)$-approximation in time $\tilde{O}(n^{4/3}B^{2/3})$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

William Kuszmaul. 2018-11-10. Efficiently Approximating Edit Distance Between Pseudorandom Strings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04300

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS