Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1811.06174

On Central Binomial Series Related to Zeta(4)

Vivek Kaushik
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, we prove two related central binomial series identities: $B(4)=\sum_{n \geq 0} \frac{\binom{2n}n}{2^{4n}(2n+1)^3}=\frac{7 \pi^3}{216}$ and $C(4)=\sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \frac{1}{n^4 \binom{2n}n}=\frac{17 \pi^4}{3240}.$ Both series resist all the standard approaches used to evaluate other well-known series. To prove the first series identity, we will evaluate a log-sine integral that is equal to $B(4).$ Evaluating this log-sine integral will lead us to computing closed forms of polylogarithms evaluated at certain complex exponentials. To prove the second identity, we will evaluate a double integral that is equal to $C(4).$ Evaluating this double integral will lead us to computing several polylogarithmic integrals, one of which has a closed form that is a linear combination of $B(4)$ and $C(4).$ After proving these series identities, we evaluate several challenging logarithmic and polylogarithmic integrals, whose evaluations involve surprising appearances of integral representations of $B(4)$ and $C(4).$ We also provide an insight into the generalization of a modern double integral proof of Euler's celebrated identity $\sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \frac{1}{n^2}=\frac{\pi^2}{6},$ in which we encounter an integral representation of $C(4).$

Explore related subjects

math.CA

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vivek Kaushik. 2018-11-15. On Central Binomial Series Related to Zeta(4). https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.06174

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On the log-concavity of the composite Bessel function $x^{\alpha}J_{\nu }\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $

For a twice differentiable function $f:\left( a,b\right) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ define $v\left( f\right) =f^{\prime}f^{\prime}-f^{\prime\prime }f.$ It is well known that the positivity of $v\left( f\right) $ implies that the function $\left\vert f\right\vert $ is strictly log-concave on each subinterval which does not contain zeros of $f.$ In this paper we provide criteria for the positivity of $v\left( F\right) $ for the composite Bessel function $F\left( x\right) =J_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\nu}\left( x\right) :=x^{\alpha}J_{\nu}\left( \beta x^{\gamma}\right) $ for positive numbers $\beta$ and $\gamma$ and real numbers $\alpha$ and $\nu.$

math.CA↗
arXiv2026

Riesz capacity ratios with negative exponents

We investigate sharp inequalities for ratios of Riesz capacities with negative exponents by combining computational experiments with rigorous analysis. For finite subsets of the line, we prove positivity of equilibrium masses when $-1<p<0$, enabling numerical tests of conjectured extremal ratios. In the plane, comparisons of the disk with regular polygon vertex sets reveal a cascade of transitions among the tested competitors and suggest a precise conjecture for the equilibrium measure of odd polygons, for which we give a partial proof. Numerical intersections of equality curves show that the regions where these sets outperform the disk are not simply nested. Similar numerical intersections occur in three dimensions between the regular-simplex equality curve and those of explicit five-point and six-point configurations. Motivated by the dimensional dependence of these comparisons, we prove that for each fixed $p<-2<q<0$, the regular simplex has a larger capacity ratio than the ball in all sufficiently large dimensions. Accompanying Python and Mathematica code supports reproduction and further testing of the conjectures.

math.CA↗
arXiv2026

Shorter proof of dimension-free $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms

We provide a shorter and more direct proof of $L^p$ estimates for maximal Riesz transforms (of an arbitrary order) in terms of the corresponding Riesz transforms, with a constant independent of the dimension of the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$. This result was originally proved by Mateu, Orobitg, P\'erez and Verdera with a constant depending on the dimension, and improved to a dimension-free inequality by Kucharski, Wr\'obel and Zienkiewicz.

math.CA↗