SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1811.07220

Determination of the L\'evy Exponent in Asset Pricing Models

Abstract

We consider the problem of determining the L\'evy exponent in a L\'evy model for asset prices given the price data of derivatives. The model, formulated under the real-world measure $\mathbb P$, consists of a pricing kernel $\{\pi_t\}_{t\geq0}$ together with one or more non-dividend-paying risky assets driven by the same L\'evy process. If $\{S_t\}_{t\geq0}$ denotes the price process of such an asset then $\{\pi_t S_t\}_{t\geq0}$ is a $\mathbb P$-martingale. The L\'evy process $\{ \xi_t \}_{t\geq0}$ is assumed to have exponential moments, implying the existence of a L\'evy exponent $\psi(\alpha) = t^{-1}\log \mathbb E(\rm e^{\alpha \xi_t})$ for $\alpha$ in an interval $A \subset \mathbb R$ containing the origin as a proper subset. We show that if the initial prices of power-payoff derivatives, for which the payoff is $H_T = (\zeta_T)^q$ for some time $T>0$, are given for a range of values of $q$, where $\{\zeta_t\}_{t\geq0}$ is the so-called benchmark portfolio defined by $\zeta_t = 1/\pi_t$, then the L\'evy exponent is determined up to an irrelevant linear term. In such a setting, derivative prices embody complete information about price jumps: in particular, the spectrum of the price jumps can be worked out from current market prices of derivatives. More generally, if $H_T = (S_T)^q$ for a general non-dividend-paying risky asset driven by a L\'evy process, and if we know that the pricing kernel is driven by the same L\'evy process, up to a factor of proportionality, then from the current prices of power-payoff derivatives we can infer the structure of the L\'evy exponent up to a transformation $\psi(\alpha) \rightarrow \psi(\alpha + \mu) - \psi(\mu) + c \alpha$, where $c$ and $\mu$ are constants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

George Bouzianis, Lane Hughston. 2018-11-17. Determination of the L\'evy Exponent in Asset Pricing Models. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219024919500080

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Variance-Optimal Hedging in the Rough Hawkes--Heston Model

We study variance-optimal stock hedging and the convergence of approximate strategies in the rough Hawkes--Heston model. Starting from the model's affine conditional transform and the affine Volterra jump framework, we obtain semi-explicit hedges for European calls and a representation of the minimum quadratic error through the Galtchouk--Kunita--Watanabe projection. Our main approximation result keeps the original stock, variance driver, and information flow fixed while regularizing the kernel used to evaluate the hedge. To handle singular memory and common marked jumps, we construct the approximate holdings from histories available before trading and preserve the conditional transform's random modulus envelope. Riccati--Volterra stability and weighted truncation then yield convergence in the original stock's trading norm on compact Fourier intervals. For calls, a joint choice of kernel regularization and Fourier cutoff gives convergence of the initial capitals and strategies, uniform-in-time square-mean convergence of continuous-time gains, and convergence of the terminal mean-square error to the variance-optimal value. A numerical experiment with shifted fractional kernels illustrates the construction on common original-market paths.

q-fin.MF

Numeraire Invariance of Entropy-Projected Martingale Measures

Let \(P\) be a fixed physical law and let \(Q\) be an equivalent martingale measure selected from the martingale-measure set associated with a chosen numeraire. A change of numeraire maps \(Q\) to \(T_LQ\), where \(d(T_LQ)=L\,dQ\) and \(L\) is the terminal likelihood ratio. The forward relative-entropy projection minimizing \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(P\Vert Q)\) commutes with this transform because its objective changes only by the constant \(-E_P\log L\). The minimal entropy martingale measure (MEMM) orientation \(D_{\mathrm{KL}}(Q\Vert P)\) does not have this property, and a trinomial counterexample shows that independently recomputed MEMMs need not be likelihood compatible. We make two economic consequences explicit. First, the two entropy orientations are precisely the \(Q\)-dependent terms in the classical convex-dual objectives for logarithmic and exponential utility, respectively. Second, likelihood compatibility is equivalent to equality of the pricing functionals obtained in the two numeraires. Hence the forward selectors value every integrable claim consistently across numeraires, whereas the two MEMMs in the counterexample assign different prices to a nonreplicable digital claim. We also prove a finite-state class-level characterization: uniform invariance over the elementary one-period likelihood-ratio families forces a smooth convex \(f\)-divergence to be logarithmic, up to scaling and affine equivalence. Finally, in finite-state markets, the forward projection exists under the usual strictly positive feasible-point condition; its density \(dP/dQ^*\) is attainable log-optimal terminal wealth, and the minimum forward entropy equals maximal expected log growth.

q-fin.MF

The Delta of a Variance Swap

We define the variance swap delta as the sensitivity of the price of variance to a change in underlying price. We use Carr-Madan spanning formulas to analyze this sensitivity when the implied volatility smile curve may depend on the underlying price. We show that the variance swap total delta is zero for the class of smile curves that are pure functions of (log) moneyness, which goes against the empirical observation that variance is up when the market is down. We propose a simple modification of the smile to correct this issue.

q-fin.MF