Algorithmic complexity in computational biology: basics, challenges and limitations

Davide Cirillo; Miguel Ponce-de-Leon; Alfonso Valencia

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1811.07312

Algorithmic complexity in computational biology: basics, challenges and limitations

Davide Cirillo·Miguel Ponce-de-Leon·Alfonso Valencia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Computational problems can be classified according to their algorithmic complexity, which is defined based on how the resources needed to solve the problem, e.g. the execution time, scale with the problem size. Many problems in computational biology are computationally infeasible in the sense that the exhaustive search for the optimal solution is prohibitive in practical terms. As a consequence, these problems are tackled through heuristics and approximations aiming to overcome the exceeding computational requirements at the cost of providing suboptimal solutions. The importance of defining the computational complexity of computational biology algorithms is a topic rarely surveyed for broad audiences of bioinformaticians and users of bioinformatics tools. However, recognizing the underlying complexity of any algorithm is essential for understanding their potential and limitations. Thus, the aim of this review is to survey the main algorithmic solutions to intractable problems in computational biology, highlighting the importance of High-Performance Computing in this area.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Davide Cirillo, Miguel Ponce-de-Leon, Alfonso Valencia. 2018-11-18. Algorithmic complexity in computational biology: basics, challenges and limitations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.07312

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Max Independent Set Remains NP-hard when Excluding a Planar Induced Minor

We show that there is a fixed planar graph $H$, namely the $5 \times 5$ grid, such that Max Independent Set remains NP-hard in $H$-induced-minor-free graphs. This refutes the Dallard--Milani\v{c}--\v{S}torgel conjecture and a weakening of it by Gartland and Lokshtanov, and by Korhonen.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC↗