Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1811.08532

On compact representations of Voronoi cells of lattices

Christoph Hunkenschröder·Gina Reuland·Matthias Schymura
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In a seminal work, Micciancio & Voulgaris (2013) described a deterministic single-exponential time algorithm for the Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on lattices. It is based on the computation of the Voronoi cell of the given lattice and thus may need exponential space as well. We address the major open question whether there exists such an algorithm that requires only polynomial space. To this end, we define a lattice basis to be $c$-compact if every facet normal of the Voronoi cell is a linear combination of the basis vectors using coefficients that are bounded by $c$ in absolute value. Given such a basis, we get a polynomial space algorithm for CVP whose running time naturally depends on $c$. Thus, our main focus is the behavior of the smallest possible value of $c$, with the following results: There always exist $c$-compact bases, where $c$ is bounded by $n^2$ for an $n$-dimension lattice; there are lattices not admitting a $c$-compact basis with $c$ growing sublinearly with the dimension; and every lattice with a zonotopal Voronoi cell has a $1$-compact basis.

Explore related subjects

cs.DSmath.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christoph Hunkenschröder, Gina Reuland, Matthias Schymura. 2018-11-20. On compact representations of Voronoi cells of lattices. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-019-01463-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗