SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1811.10866

Exploiting Numerical Sparsity for Efficient Learning : Faster Eigenvector Computation and Regression

Abstract

In this paper, we obtain improved running times for regression and top eigenvector computation for numerically sparse matrices. Given a data matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times d}$ where every row $a \in \mathbb{R}^d$ has $\|a\|_2^2 \leq L$ and numerical sparsity at most $s$, i.e. $\|a\|_1^2 / \|a\|_2^2 \leq s$, we provide faster algorithms for these problems in many parameter settings. For top eigenvector computation, we obtain a running time of $\tilde{O}(nd + r(s + \sqrt{r s}) / \mathrm{gap}^2)$ where $\mathrm{gap} > 0$ is the relative gap between the top two eigenvectors of $A^\top A$ and $r$ is the stable rank of $A$. This running time improves upon the previous best unaccelerated running time of $O(nd + r d / \mathrm{gap}^2)$ as it is always the case that $r \leq d$ and $s \leq d$. For regression, we obtain a running time of $\tilde{O}(nd + (nL / \mu) \sqrt{s nL / \mu})$ where $\mu > 0$ is the smallest eigenvalue of $A^\top A$. This running time improves upon the previous best unaccelerated running time of $\tilde{O}(nd + n L d / \mu)$. This result expands the regimes where regression can be solved in nearly linear time from when $L/\mu = \tilde{O}(1)$ to when $L / \mu = \tilde{O}(d^{2/3} / (sn)^{1/3})$. Furthermore, we obtain similar improvements even when row norms and numerical sparsities are non-uniform and we show how to achieve even faster running times by accelerating using approximate proximal point [Frostig et. al. 2015] / catalyst [Lin et. al. 2015]. Our running times depend only on the size of the input and natural numerical measures of the matrix, i.e. eigenvalues and $\ell_p$ norms, making progress on a key open problem regarding optimal running times for efficient large-scale learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Neha Gupta, Aaron Sidford. 2018-11-27. Exploiting Numerical Sparsity for Efficient Learning : Faster Eigenvector Computation and Regression. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.10866

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS