SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1812.03940

Rapid Prototyping Model for Healthcare Alternative Payment Models: Replicating the Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration

Abstract

Innovation in healthcare payment and service delivery utilizes high cost, high risk pilots paired with traditional program evaluations. Decision-makers are unable to reliably forecast the impacts of pilot interventions in this complex system, complicating the feasibility assessment of proposed healthcare models. We developed and validated a Discrete Event Simulation (DES) model of primary care for patients with Diabetes to allow rapid prototyping and assessment of models before pilot implementation. We replicated four outcomes from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice pilot. The DES model simulates a synthetic population's healthcare experience, including symptom onset, appointment scheduling, screening, and treatment, as well as the impact of physician training. A network of detailed event modules was developed from peer-reviewed literature. Synthetic patients' attributes modify the probability distributions for event outputs and direct them through an episode of care; attributes are in turn modified by patients' experiences. Our model replicates the direction of the effect of physician training on the selected outcomes, and the strength of the effect increases with the number of trainings. The simulated effect strength replicates the pilot results for eye exams and nephropathy screening, but over-estimates results for HbA1c and LDL screening. Our model will improve decision-makers' abilities to assess the feasibility of pilot success, with reproducible, literature-based systems models. Our model identifies intervention and healthcare system components to which outcomes are sensitive, so these aspects can be monitored and controlled during pilot implementation. More work is needed to improve replication of HbA1c and LDL screening, and to elaborate sub-models related to intervention components.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jarrod Olson, Amir Rahimi, Po Hsu Allen Chen, J. Elizabeth Jackson, Tyler Coy, Adrienne Cocci, Nancy McMillan, Jeff Geppert. 2018-12-10. Rapid Prototyping Model for Healthcare Alternative Payment Models: Replicating the Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03940

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Design and Implementation of a Virtual Statistical Computing Lab to Teach R Coding to Introductory Statistics Students

Motivated by national calls for computationally enriched, data-centric instruction across the statistics curriculum, this study investigates the design, implementation, and impact of a Virtual Statistical Computing Lab (VSCL) integrated into an introductory statistics course at a medium-sized minority-serving university in the USA. The redesigned course embedded R-based coding through two virtual lab formats: Design I (a static Posit Cloud environment) and Design II (an interactive learnr-based interface). Using a quasi-experimental design across three instructional formats, traditional (no lab), Design I, and Design II, we evaluated students' conceptual learning gains, levels of data science (DS) readiness, and DS aspirations. The results indicated significant learning gains across all groups, with the highest gains observed in Design II. Students in both VSCL formats achieved greater gains in DS readiness than the traditional group, with Design II again yielding the largest gains across the demographic subgroups. Conversely, DS aspirations remained low or declined, suggesting a gap between skill acquisition and long-term interest. These findings highlight the value of structured, interactive computing environments in supporting statistical reasoning and building confidence in modern data tools. They also point to the need for intentional curricular bridges and career mentoring to help students translate early computing exposure into sustained academic and professional pathways in statistics and data science.

stat.OT

Statistical Theory in the Age of Machine-Assisted Mathematics: Rethinking How Theory Is Made and Taught

The computational revolution is advancing at an unprecedented pace. The combination of proof-assistant technologies and generative AI tools has recently enabled the solution of complex problems in pure mathematics at a scale that seemed unattainable only a few years ago. However, these technologies have not yet become standard tools in the development of statistical theory. In this paper, we do not present new theoretical results. Instead, we discuss five case studies involving classical problems in statistics and describe how they can be analyzed using a machine proof-checking. Our goal is not to propose a definitive workflow, but to stimulate reflection on how these technologies may transform theoretical research and advanced statistical education. We focus on two main aspects. First, statistical theory often compresses substantial mathematical content into expressions such as "under the usual regularity conditions". Formalization in a machine-verifiable language forces each assumption to be explicit, reveal hidden dependencies, and provide a deeper understanding of the formalized objects. Second, we argue that the statistical community could benefit from a collaborative effort to build repositories of formalized axioms, definitions, and theorems, supporting more precise and reliable theoretical developments. Finally, we discuss the role of these tools in graduate education. Just as high-level programming languages revolutionized empirical research by enabling rapid experimentation and prototyping, machine-assisted formalization may introduce a new paradigm for the development, verification, and communication of statistical theory.

stat.OT

Statistical Leadership of What? Statistics After AI

Statisticians have spent over a century arguing that we are more than calculators, usually by pointing to what else we know. AI is making that defense harder, since the list of what only statisticians can do grows shorter with each model release. AI makes claims cheap to generate and may eventually make the statistics behind them cheap too. However, a model cannot be answerable in the way that statistical practice requires. Statistical leadership then becomes a question of which claims we are there to answer for, including the ones we answer for in advance by building judgment into systems.

stat.OT