Efficient Structured Matrix Recovery and Nearly-Linear Time Algorithms for Solving Inverse Symmetric $M$-Matrices

Arun Jambulapati; Kirankumar Shiragur; Aaron Sidford

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1812.06295

Efficient Structured Matrix Recovery and Nearly-Linear Time Algorithms for Solving Inverse Symmetric $M$-Matrices

Arun Jambulapati·Kirankumar Shiragur·Aaron Sidford

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we show how to recover a spectral approximations to broad classes of structured matrices using only a polylogarithmic number of adaptive linear measurements to either the matrix or its inverse. Leveraging this result we obtain faster algorithms for variety of linear algebraic problems. Key results include: $\bullet$ A nearly linear time algorithm for solving the inverse of symmetric $M$-matrices, a strict superset of Laplacians and SDD matrices. $\bullet$ An $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ time algorithm for solving $n \times n$ linear systems that are constant spectral approximations of Laplacians or more generally, SDD matrices. $\bullet$ An $\tilde{O}(n^2)$ algorithm to recover a spectral approximation of a $n$-vertex graph using only $\tilde{O}(1)$ matrix-vector multiplies with its Laplacian matrix. The previous best results for each problem either used a trivial number of queries to exactly recover the matrix or a trivial $O(n^\omega)$ running time, where $\omega$ is the matrix multiplication constant. We achieve these results by generalizing recent semidefinite programming based linear sized sparsifier results of Lee and Sun (2017) and providing iterative methods inspired by the semistreaming sparsification results of Kapralov, Lee, Musco, Musco and Sidford (2014) and input sparsity time linear system solving results of Li, Miller, and Peng (2013). We hope that by initiating study of these natural problems, expanding the robustness and scope of recent nearly linear time linear system solving research, and providing general matrix recovery machinery this work may serve as a stepping stone for faster algorithms.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS math.OC math.ST stat.TH

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Arun Jambulapati, Kirankumar Shiragur, Aaron Sidford. 2018-12-15. Efficient Structured Matrix Recovery and Nearly-Linear Time Algorithms for Solving Inverse Symmetric $M$-Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06295

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗