Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1812.11774

Tighter bounds for online bipartite matching

Uriel Feige
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the online bipartite matching problem, introduced by Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani [1990]. For bipartite graphs with matchings of size $n$, it is known that the Ranking randomized algorithm matches at least $(1 - \frac{1}{e})n$ edges in expectation. It is also known that no online algorithm matches more than $(1 - \frac{1}{e})n + O(1)$ edges in expectation, when the input is chosen from a certain distribution that we refer to as $D_n$. This upper bound also applies to fractional matchings. We review the known proofs for this last statement. In passing we observe that the $O(1)$ additive term (in the upper bound for fractional matching) is $\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2e} + O(\frac{1}{n})$, and that this term is tight: the online algorithm known as Balance indeed produces a fractional matching of this size. We provide a new proof that exactly characterizes the expected cardinality of the (integral) matching produced by Ranking when the input graph comes from the support of $D_n$. This expectation turns out to be $(1 - \frac{1}{e})n + 1 - \frac{2}{e} + O(\frac{1}{n!})$, and serves as an upper bound on the performance ratio of any online (integral) matching algorithm.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Uriel Feige. 2018-12-31. Tighter bounds for online bipartite matching. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11774

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗