Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1901.02209

Subset Feedback Vertex Set in Chordal and Split Graphs

Geevarghese Philip·Varun Rajan·Saket Saurabh·Prafullkumar Tale
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the \textsc{Subset Feedback Vertex Set (Subset-FVS)} problem the input is a graph $G$, a subset \(T\) of vertices of \(G\) called the `terminal' vertices, and an integer $k$. The task is to determine whether there exists a subset of vertices of cardinality at most $k$ which together intersect all cycles which pass through the terminals. \textsc{Subset-FVS} generalizes several well studied problems including \textsc{Feedback Vertex Set} and \textsc{Multiway Cut}. This problem is known to be \NP-Complete even in split graphs. Cygan et al. proved that \textsc{Subset-FVS} is fixed parameter tractable (\FPT) in general graphs when parameterized by $k$ [SIAM J. Discrete Math (2013)]. In split graphs a simple observation reduces the problem to an equivalent instance of the $3$-\textsc{Hitting Set} problem with same solution size. This directly implies, for \textsc{Subset-FVS} \emph{restricted to split graphs}, (i) an \FPT algorithm which solves the problem in $\OhStar(2.076^k)$ time \footnote{The \(\OhStar()\) notation hides polynomial factors.}% for \textsc{Subset-FVS} in Chordal % Graphs [Wahlstr\"om, Ph.D. Thesis], and (ii) a kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^3)$. We improve both these results for \textsc{Subset-FVS} on split graphs; we derive (i) a kernel of size $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ which is the best possible unless $\NP \subseteq \coNP/{\sf poly}$, and (ii) an algorithm which solves the problem in time $\mathcal{O}^*(2^k)$. Our algorithm, in fact, solves \textsc{Subset-FVS} on the more general class of \emph{chordal graphs}, also in $\mathcal{O}^*(2^k)$ time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Geevarghese Philip, Varun Rajan, Saket Saurabh, Prafullkumar Tale. 2019-01-08. Subset Feedback Vertex Set in Chordal and Split Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02209

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗