arXiv · 1901.05673
Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "
Abstract
We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Berthold-Georg Englert, Kelvin Horia, Jibo Dai, Yink Loong Len, Hui Khoon Ng. 2019-01-17. Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' ". https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.99.026104
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.