SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1902.00064

Completeness of infinitary heterogeneous logic

Abstract

Given a regular cardinal $κ$ such that $κ^{<κ}=κ$ (e.g., if the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis holds), we develop a proof system for classical infinitary logic that includes heterogeneous quantification (i.e., infinite alternate sequences of quantifiers) within the language $\mathcal{L}_{κ^+, κ}$, where there are conjunctions and disjunctions of at most $κ$ any formulas and quantification (including the heterogeneous one) is applied to less than $κ$ many variables. This type of quantification is interpreted in $\mathcal{S}et$ using the usual second-order formulation in terms of strategies for games, and the axioms are based on a stronger variant of the axiom of determinacy for game semantics. Within this axiom system we prove the soundness and completeness theorem with respect to a class of set-valued structures that we call well-determined. Although this class is more restrictive than the class of determined structures in Takeuti's determinate logic, the completeness theorem works in our case for a wider variety of formulas of $\mathcal{L}_{κ^+, κ}$, and the category of well-determined models of heterogeneous theories is accessible. Our system is formulated within the sequent style of categorical logic and we do not need to impose any specific requirements on the proof trees, disregarding thus the eigenvariable conditions needed in Takeuti's system. We also investigate intuitionistic systems with heterogeneous quantifiers and prove analogously a completeness theorem with respect to well-determined structures in categories in general, in $κ$-Grothendieck toposes in particular, and, when $κ^{<κ}=κ$, also in Kripke models. Finally, we consider an extension of our system in which heterogeneous quantification with bounded quantifiers is expressible, and extend our completeness results to that case.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian Espíndola. 2019-01-31. Completeness of infinitary heterogeneous logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00064

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO