Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.02304

New Amortized Cell-Probe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems

Sayan Bhattacharya·Monika Henzinger·Stefan Neumann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We build upon the recent papers by Weinstein and Yu (FOCS'16), Larsen (FOCS'12), and Clifford et al. (FOCS'15) to present a general framework that gives amortized lower bounds on the update and query times of dynamic data structures. Using our framework, we present two concrete results. (1) For the dynamic polynomial evaluation problem, where the polynomial is defined over a finite field of size $n^{1+\Omega(1)}$ and has degree $n$, any dynamic data structure must either have an amortized update time of $\Omega((\lg n/\lg \lg n)^2)$ or an amortized query time of $\Omega((\lg n/\lg \lg n)^2)$. (2) For the dynamic online matrix vector multiplication problem, where we get an $n \times n$ matrix whose entires are drawn from a finite field of size $n^{\Theta(1)}$, any dynamic data structure must either have an amortized update time of $\Omega((\lg n/\lg \lg n)^2)$ or an amortized query time of $\Omega(n \cdot (\lg n/\lg \lg n)^2)$. For these two problems, the previous works by Larsen (FOCS'12) and Clifford et al. (FOCS'15) gave the same lower bounds, but only for worst case update and query times. Our bounds match the highest unconditional lower bounds known till date for any dynamic problem in the cell-probe model.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sayan Bhattacharya, Monika Henzinger, Stefan Neumann. 2019-02-06. New Amortized Cell-Probe Lower Bounds for Dynamic Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02304

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗