SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1902.02736

The Cohomology of the Ordinals I: Basic Theory and Consistency Results

Abstract

In this paper, the first in a projected two-part series, we describe an organizing framework for the study of infinitary combinatorics. This framework is \v{C}ech cohomology. We show in particular that the \v{C}ech cohomology groups of the ordinals articulate higher-dimensional generalizations of Todorcevic's walks and coherent sequences techniques, and begin to account for those techniques' `unreasonable effectiveness' on $\omega_1$. This discussion occupies the first half of our paper and is written with a general mathematical audience in mind. We turn in the paper's second half to more properly set-theoretic considerations. We describe a number of consistency results on the cohomology groups of the ordinals which certify their status as a graded family of incompactness principles. We show in particular that nontrivial cohomology groups on the ordinals are in some tension with large cardinals, and are maximally extant in G\"{o}del's model $\mathrm{L}$. We describe forcings to add, then trivialize, nontrivial $n$-cocycles, and conclude with some comparison of these principles with those benchmark incompactness phenomena, the existence of square sequences and failures of stationary reflection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jeffrey Bergfalk, Chris Lambie-Hanson. 2019-02-07. The Cohomology of the Ordinals I: Basic Theory and Consistency Results. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02736

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO