arXiv · 1902.06721
Comparison of the lateral retention forces on sessile, pendant, and inverted sessile drops
Abstract
We compare the lateral retention forces on sessile drops (which are drops that are placed on top of a solid surface), pendant drops (which are drops that are placed on the underside of the surface), and inverted sessile drops (which are drops that are first placed on top and then on the underside of the surface by flipping the surface). We have found experimentally that the retention force on a truly pendant drop is always smaller than that on a sessile drop. However, the retention force on an inverted sessile drop is comparable to, and usually larger than, that on a sessile drop. Thus, the retention force on a drop depends not only on whether it is placed on top or on bottom of a surface, but also on the history of drop deposition, since such history affects the width, the shape and the contact angles of the drop.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Rafael de la Madrid, Fabian Garza, Justin Kirk, Huy Luong, Levi Snowden, Jonathan Taylor, Benjamin Vizena. 2019-02-18. Comparison of the lateral retention forces on sessile, pendant, and inverted sessile drops. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06721
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.