Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.10983

Graph and String Parameters: Connections Between Pathwidth, Cutwidth and the Locality Number

Katrin Casel·Joel D. Day·Pamela Fleischmann·Tomasz Kociumaka·Florin Manea·Markus L. Schmid
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We investigate the locality number, a recently introduced structural parameter for strings (with applications in pattern matching with variables), and its connection to two important graph-parameters, cutwidth and pathwidth. These connections allow us to show that computing the locality number is NP-hard, but fixed-parameter tractable, if parameterised by the locality number or by the alphabet size, which has been formulated as open problems in the literature. Moreover, the locality number can be approximated with ratio O(sqrt(log(opt)) log(n)). An important aspect of our work -- that is relevant in its own right and of independent interest -- is that we identify connections between the string parameter of the locality number on the one hand, and the famous graph parameters of cutwidth and pathwidth, on the other hand. These two parameters have been jointly investigated in the literature and are arguably among the most central graph parameters that are based on "linearisations" of graphs. In this way, we also identify a direct approximation preserving reduction from cutwidth to pathwidth, which shows that any polynomial f(opt,|V|)-approximation algorithm for pathwidth yields a polynomial 2f(2 opt,h)-approximation algorithm for cutwidth on multigraphs (where h is the number of edges). In particular, this translates known approximation ratios for pathwidth into new approximation ratios for cutwidth, namely O(sqrt(log(opt)) log(h)) and O(sqrt(log(opt)) opt) for (multi) graphs with h edges.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Katrin Casel, Joel D. Day, Pamela Fleischmann, Tomasz Kociumaka, Florin Manea, Markus L. Schmid. 2019-02-28. Graph and String Parameters: Connections Between Pathwidth, Cutwidth and the Locality Number. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10983

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗