arXiv · 1903.09511
Some Remarks on a recent article by J. -P. Allouche
Abstract
In 1980 Otto G. Ruehr made some puzzling comments that a certain identity A, that he proved, is equivalent to another identity B, but he did not explain why they are equivalent. Recently J.-P. Allouche tried to explain why they are "equivalent", using about eight pages. We comment that it is extremely unlikely to be Ruehr's reasoning (he probably got mixed up with a different problem), but be that as it may, it is not worthwhile to try and deduce B from A, since both A and B are routinely provable using Wilf-Zeilberger algorithmic proof theory (implemented in Maple) and the Almkvist-Zeilberger algorithm.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Shalosh B. Ekhad, Doron Zeilberger. 2019-03-22. Some Remarks on a recent article by J. -P. Allouche. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09511
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.