Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1903.09780

Superconducting phase in the BCS model with imaginary magnetic field. III. Non-vanishing free dispersion relations

Yohei Kashima
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We analyze a class of the BCS model, whose free dispersion relation is non-vanishing, under the influence of imaginary magnetic field at positive temperature. The magnitude of the negative coupling constant must be small but is allowed to be independent of the temperature and the imaginary magnetic field. The infinite-volume limit of the free energy density is characterized. A spontaneous symmetry breaking and an off-diagonal long range order are proved to occur only in high temperatures. This is because the gap equation in this model has a positive solution only if the temperature is higher than a critical value. The proof is based on a double-scale integration of the Grassmann integral formulation. In this scheme we integrate with the infrared covariance first and with the ultra-violet covariance afterwards. As the other focus, we study geometric properties of the phase boundaries, which are periodic copies of a closed curve in the two-dimensional space of the temperature and the real time variable. Here we adopt the real time variable in place of the temperature times the imaginary magnetic field by considering its relevance within contemporary physics of dynamical phase transition at positive temperature. As the main result, we show that for any choice of a non-vanishing free dispersion relation the representative curve of the phase boundaries has only one local minimum point, or in other words the phase boundaries do not oscillate with temperature, if and only if the minimum of the magnitude of the free dispersion relation over the maximum is larger than the critical value $\sqrt{17-12\sqrt{2}}$.

Explore related subjects

math-phmath.MP

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yohei Kashima. 2019-03-23. Superconducting phase in the BCS model with imaginary magnetic field. III. Non-vanishing free dispersion relations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09780

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗