SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1904.01085

Continuous Selections of Lower semicontinuous Set-valued Mappings

Abstract

A space $X$ is strongly $Y$-selective (resp., $Y$-selective) if every lower semicontinuous mapping from $Y$ to the nonempty subsets (resp., nonempty closed subsets) of $X$ has a continuous selection. We also call $X$ (strongly) $C$-selective if it is (strongly) $Y$-selective for any countable space $Y$, and (strongly) $L$-selective if it is (strongly) ($\omega+1$)-selective. E. Michael showed that every first countable space is strongly $C$-selective. We extend this by showing that every $W$-space in the sense of the second author is strongly $C$-selective. We also show that every GO-space is $C$-selective, and that every $L$-selective space has Arhangel'skii's property $\alpha_1$. We obtain an example under $\mathfrak p=\mathfrak c$ of a strongly $L$-selective space that is not $C$-selective, and we show that it is consistent with and independent of ZFC that a space is strongly $L$-selective iff it is $L$-selective and Fr\'echet. Finally, we answer a question of the third author and Junnila by showing that the ordinal space $\omega_1 +1$ is not self-selective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ziqin Feng, Gary Gruenhage, Rongxin Shen. 2019-04-01. Continuous Selections of Lower semicontinuous Set-valued Mappings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01085

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN