SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1904.05483

Parallels Between Phase Transitions and Circuit Complexity?

Abstract

In many natural average-case problems, there are or there are believed to be critical values in the parameter space where the structure of the space of solutions changes in a fundamental way. These phase transitions are often believed to coincide with drastic changes in the computational complexity of the associated problem. In this work, we study the circuit complexity of inference in the broadcast tree model, which has important applications in phylogenetic reconstruction and close connections to community detection. We establish a number of qualitative connections between phase transitions and circuit complexity in this model. Specifically, we show that there is a $\mathbf{TC}^0$ circuit that competes with the Bayes optimal predictor in some range of parameters above the Kesten-Stigum bound. We also show that there is a $16$ label broadcast tree model beneath the Kesten-Stigum bound in which it is possible to accurately guess the label of the root, but beating random guessing is $\mathbf{NC}^1$-hard on average. The key to locating phase transitions is often to study some intrinsic notions of complexity associated with belief propagation \--- e.g. where do linear statistics fail, or when is the posterior sensitive to noise? Ours is the first work to study the complexity of belief propagation in a way that is grounded in circuit complexity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ankur Moitra, Elchanan Mossel, Colin Sandon. 2019-04-11. Parallels Between Phase Transitions and Circuit Complexity?. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05483

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Computational Complexity of Holant Problems on 4-regular Graphs from the Stable Subgroup Sequence of $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$

The Holant framework provides a general setting for studying counting problems and includes graph homomorphisms (\#GH) and counting constraint satisfaction problems (\#CSP) as special cases. Over the past twenty years, a series of computational complexity dichotomies have been established for Holant problems, but the classification for complex-valued signatures is still open. The main obstacle is the case in which all signatures have even arity. In this paper, we establish a dichotomy for Holant problems with a complex-valued 4-ary signature, which is a key base case for the full classification of Holant problems. We present a new strategy by introducing Schur's theorem, the classification of finite subgroups of $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ and stable subgroup sequences into the proof. These new techniques are of independent interest.

cs.CC

Topology inside NC$^1$

We show that ACC$^0$ is precisely what can be computed with constant-width circuits of polynomial size and polylogarithmic genus. This extends a characterization given by Hansen, showing that planar constant-width circuits also characterize ACC$^0$. Thus polylogarithmic genus provides no additional computational power in this model. We consider other generalizations of planarity, including crossing number and thickness. We show that constant-width circuits of polynomial size and thickness two already suffice to capture all of NC$^1$.

cs.CC