SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1904.07131

General Framework for Metric Optimization Problems with Delay or with Deadlines

Abstract

In this paper, we present a framework used to construct and analyze algorithms for online optimization problems with deadlines or with delay over a metric space. Using this framework, we present algorithms for several different problems. We present an $O(D^{2})$-competitive deterministic algorithm for online multilevel aggregation with delay on a tree of depth $D$, an exponential improvement over the $O(D^{4}2^{D})$-competitive algorithm of Bienkowski et al. (ESA '16), where the only previously-known improvement was for the special case of deadlines by Buchbinder et al. (SODA '17). We also present an $O(\log^{2}n)$-competitive randomized algorithm for online service with delay over any general metric space of $n$ points, improving upon the $O(\log^{4}n)$-competitive algorithm by Azar et al. (STOC '17). In addition, we present the problem of online facility location with deadlines. In this problem, requests arrive over time in a metric space, and need to be served until their deadlines by facilities that are opened momentarily for some cost. We also consider the problem of facility location with delay, in which the deadlines are replaced with arbitrary delay functions. For those problems, we present $O(\log^{2}n)$-competitive algorithms, with $n$ the number of points in the metric space. The algorithmic framework we present includes techniques for the design of algorithms as well as techniques for their analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yossi Azar, Noam Touitou. 2019-04-15. General Framework for Metric Optimization Problems with Delay or with Deadlines. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS