Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1904.09438

Decomposing a Graph into Unigraphs

Takashi Horiyama·Jun Kawahara·Shin-ichi Minato·Yu Nakahata
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Unigraphs are graphs uniquely determined by their own degree sequence up to isomorphism. There are many subclasses of unigraphs such as threshold graphs, split matrogenic graphs, matroidal graphs, and matrogenic graphs. Unigraphs and these subclasses are well studied in the literature. Nevertheless, there are few results on superclasses of unigraphs. In this paper, we introduce two types of generalizations of unigraphs: $k$-unigraphs and $k$-strong unigraphs. We say that a graph $G$ is a $k$-unigraph if $G$ can be partitioned into $k$ unigraphs. $G$ is a $k$-strong unigraph if not only each subgraph is a unigraph but also the whole graph can be uniquely determined up to isomorphism, by using the degree sequences of all the subgraphs in the partition. We describe a relation between $k$-strong unigraphs and the subgraph isomorphism problem. We show some properties of $k$-(strong) unigraphs and algorithmic results on calculating the minimum $k$ such that a graph $G$ is a $k$-(strong) unigraph. This paper will open many other research topics.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.DMmath.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Takashi Horiyama, Jun Kawahara, Shin-ichi Minato, Yu Nakahata. 2019-04-20. Decomposing a Graph into Unigraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09438

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗