Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1904.11184

Smart Jammer and LTE Network Strategies in An Infinite-Horizon Zero-Sum Repeated Game with Asymmetric and Incomplete Information

Farhan M. Aziz·Lichun Li·Jeff S. Shamma·Gordon L. Stuber
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

LTE/LTE-Advanced networks are known to be vulnerable to denial-of-service and loss-of-service attacks from smart jammers. In this article, the interaction between a smart jammer and LTE network is modeled as an infinite-horizon, zero-sum, asymmetric repeated game. The smart jammer and eNode B are modeled as the informed and the uninformed player, respectively. The main purpose of this article is to construct efficient suboptimal strategies for both players that can be used to solve the above-mentioned infinite-horizon repeated game with asymmetric and incomplete information. It has been shown in game-theoretic literature that security strategies provide optimal solution in zero-sum games. It is also shown that both players' security strategies in an infinite-horizon asymmetric game depend only on the history of the informed player's actions. However, fixed-sized sufficient statistics are needed for both players to solve the above-mentioned game efficiently. The smart jammer uses its evolving belief state as the fixed-sized sufficient statistics for the repeated game. Whereas, the LTE network (uninformed player) uses worst-case regret of its security strategy and its anti-discounted update as the fixed-sized sufficient statistics. Although fixed-sized sufficient statistics are employed by both players, optimal security strategy computation in {\lambda}-discounted asymmetric games is still hard to perform because of non-convexity. Hence, the problem is convexified in this article by devising `approximated' security strategies for both players that are based on approximated optimal game value. However, `approximated' strategies require full monitoring. Therefore, a simplistic yet effective `expected' strategy is also constructed for the LTE network that does not require full monitoring. The simulation results show that the smart jammer plays non-revealing and misleading strategies.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.SYeess.SPeess.SY

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Farhan M. Aziz, Lichun Li, Jeff S. Shamma, Gordon L. Stuber. 2019-04-25. Smart Jammer and LTE Network Strategies in An Infinite-Horizon Zero-Sum Repeated Game with Asymmetric and Incomplete Information. https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.11184

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗