SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1905.00148

Inventory Routing Problem with Facility Location

Abstract

We study problems that integrate depot location decisions along with the inventory routing problem of serving clients from these depots over time balancing the costs of routing vehicles from the depots with the holding costs of demand delivered before they are due. Since the inventory routing problem is already complex, we study the version that assumes that the daily vehicle routes are direct connections from the depot thus forming stars as solutions, and call this problem the Star Inventory Routing Problem with Facility Location (SIRPFL). As a stepping stone to solving SIRPFL, we first study the Inventory Access Problem (IAP), which is the single depot, single client special case of IRP. The Uncapacitated IAP is known to have a polynomial time dynamic program. We provide an NP-hardness reduction for Capacitated IAP where each demand cannot be split among different trips. We give a $3$-approximation for the case when demands can be split and a $6$-approximation for the unsplittable case. For Uncapacitated SIRPFL, we provide a $12$-approximation by rounding an LP relaxation. Combining the ideas from Capacitated IAP and Uncapacitated SIRPFL, we obtain a $24$-approximation for Capacitated Splittable SIRPFL and a $48$-approximation for the most general version, the Capacitated Unsplittable SIRPFL.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yang Jiao, R. Ravi. 2019-05-01. Inventory Routing Problem with Facility Location. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00148

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS