SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1905.03070

Testing Bipartitness in an Augmented VDF Bounded-Degree Graph Model

Abstract

In a recent work (ECCC, TR18-171, 2018), we introduced models of testing graph properties in which, in addition to answers to the usual graph-queries, the tester obtains {\em random vertices drawn according to an arbitrary distribution $D$}. Such a tester is required to distinguish between graphs that have the property and graphs that are far from having the property, {\em where the distance between graphs is defined based on the unknown vertex distribution $D$}. These ("vertex-distribution free" (VDF)) models generalize the standard models in which $D$ is postulated to be uniform on the vertex-set, and they were studies both in the dense graph model and in the bounded-degree graph model. The focus of the aforementioned work was on testers, called {\sf strong}, whose query complexity depends only on the proximity parameter $\epsilon$. Unfortunately, in the standard bounded-degree graph model, some natural properties such as Bipartiteness do not have strong testers, and others (like cycle-freeness) do not have strong testers of one-sided error (whereas one-sided error was shown inherent to the VDF model). Hence, it was suggested to study general (i.e., non-strong) testers of "sub-linear" complexity. In this work, we pursue the foregoing suggestion, but do so in a model that augments the model presented in the aforementioned work. Specifically, we provide the tester with an evaluation oracle to the unknown distribution $D$, in addition to samples of $D$ and oracle access to the tested graph. Our main results are testers for Bipartitness and cycle-freeness, in this augmented model, having complexity that is almost-linear in the square root of the "effective support size" of $D$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Oded Goldreich. 2019-05-08. Testing Bipartitness in an Augmented VDF Bounded-Degree Graph Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.03070

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS