SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1905.05392

QPS-r: A Cost-Effective Crossbar Scheduling Algorithm and Its Stability and Delay Analysis

Abstract

In an input-queued switch, a crossbar schedule, or a matching between the input ports and the output ports needs to be computed in each switching cycle, or time slot. Designing switching algorithms with very low computational complexity, that lead to high throughput and small delay is a challenging problem. There appears to be a fundamental tradeoff between the computational complexity of the switching algorithm and the resultants throughput and delay. Parallel maximal matching algorithms (adapted for switching) appear to have stricken a sweet spot in this tradeoff, and prior work has shown the following performance guarantees. Using maximal matchings in every time slot results in at least 50% switch throughput and order-optimal (i.e., independent of the switch size N) average delay bounds for various traffic arrival processes. On the other hand, their computational complexity can be as low as $O(log^2N)$ per port/processor, which is much lower than those of the algorithms such as maximum weighted matching which ensures better throughput performance. In this work, we propose QPS-r, a parallel iterative switching algorithm that has the lowest possible computational complexity: O(1) per port. Using Lyapunov stability analysis, we show that the throughput and delay performance is identical to that of maximal matching algorithm. Although QPS-r builds upon an existing technique called Queue-Proportional Sampling (QPS), in this paper, we provide analytical guarantees on its throughput and delay under i.i.d. traffic as well as a Markovian traffic model which can model many realistic traffic patterns. We also demonstrate that QPS-3 (running 3 iterations) has comparable empirical throughput and delay performances as iSLIP (running $log_2 N$ iterations), a refined and optimized representative maximal matching algorithm adapted for switching.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Long Gong, Jun Xu, Liang Liu, Siva Theja Maguluri. 2019-05-14. QPS-r: A Cost-Effective Crossbar Scheduling Algorithm and Its Stability and Delay Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05392

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Shared-Cache Model for Parallel Scans

In modern AI Accelerators and GPGPUs, many concurrent cores repeatedly access the same shared data. This pattern occurs in attention, where different query tiles share the same K/V block, GEMM, where every tile in a row reads the same panel, and many other operators. We name this pattern parallel scan. Due to a significant amount of data reuse in this pattern, the cache is expected to capture as much data reuse as possible and largely reduce requests sent to the main memory for both performance and energy consumption concerns. However, in reality, because of the intrinsic asynchrony of multi-cores, the actual cache miss rate and DRAM traffic can be much higher compared to ideal cases. In this paper, we propose PASCAL, a shared-cache model for parallel scans. It is aware of the dynamic feature of progress divergence across multi-cores, correlate the divergence with the combination of different factors such as occupancy, and predicts the cache miss rate before execution. Because prediction needs no target trace, timing, or counters, PASCAL supports design-space exploration at scales where cycle-accurate simulation is impractical, and its policy-independent bound states how much traffic no replacement policy can avoid. A MAPE of 13.84% is achieved in a 60-configuration dataset with various software pipeline depths, occupancies, and memory access data paths on an NVIDIA GB10 GPU, against 44.79% for physical-wave TileSight and 54.16% for exact symbolic SDCM.

cs.PF

Mathematical Modeling of a Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow for Large-Scale, Cross-Facility Workflows

We present the mathematical foundations of a \emph{Cognitive Continuum Digital Shadow} (CCDS), a decision-support layer between users and the cross-facility infrastructure---instruments, networks, data stores and compute centers---of exascale and post-exascale scientific workflows. The CCDS couples a state-space representation of the continuum with multistage stochastic programming, so that deployment scenarios can be explored and optimized \emph{before} jobs are launched. This allows operators and users to quantify the cost, makespan and energy trade-offs of a workflow under uncertain resource availability, and hedge their decisions accordingly. We formulate the underlying optimization as a multimode, resource-constrained, stochastic supply-chain network design problem and demonstrate it on a realistic genomics workflow scheduled across heterogeneous HPC and data-center resources. This is the first of three papers; the second treats the underlying software architecture and the third reports large-scale use-cases.

cs.PF

RGB Input Pipelines: Throughput, GPU Memory, and Transformation Coverage

An image-augmentation pipeline must deliver a complete batch before a model can use it. We compare seven input paths from five libraries, starting with RGB JPEG files and ending with a synchronized CUDA float16 batch. We manually matched transformation recipes and parameters across libraries to make the workloads as comparable as possible. The experiment uses 57 selected recipes, a batch size of 256, and one NVIDIA L4 machine. Throughput and peak process GPU memory are recorded together in 759 measurements. On the 11 recipes shared by all paths, DALI and AlbumentationsX have median throughputs of 5,029 and 4,679 images/s, with median peak GPU memory of 2,086 and 1,852 MiB. Broader pairwise comparisons favor AlbumentationsX on 26/26 TorchVision recipes, 50/51 Kornia recipes, and 25/26 Pillow recipes. DALI is faster than AlbumentationsX on all 22 shared recipes, with a median throughput ratio of 1.18x. A separate census reports coverage of the 118 entries in a selected AlbumentationsX RGB catalog. The study measures input preparation at fixed settings; it does not measure model training, numerical equivalence, or the best attainable configuration of each library. Benchmark code: https://github.com/albumentations-team/benchmark.

cs.PF