SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1907.04521

The complexity of the first-order theory of pure equality

Abstract

We will find a lower bound on the recognition complexity of the theories that are nontrivial relative to some equivalence relation (this relation may be equality), namely, each of these theories is consistent with the formula, whose sense is that there exist two non-equivalent elements. However, at first, we will obtain a lower bound on the computational complexity for the first-order theory of Boolean algebra that has only two elements. For this purpose, we will code the long-continued deterministic Turing machine computations by the relatively short-length quantified Boolean formulae; the modified Stockmeyer and Meyer method will appreciably be used for this simulation. Then, we will transform the modeling formulae of the theory of this Boolean algebra to the simulation ones of the first-order theory of the only equivalence relation in polynomial time. Since the computational complexity of these theories is not polynomial, we obtain that the class $\mathbf{P}$ is a proper subclass of $\mathbf{PSPACE}$ (Polynomial Time is a proper subset of Polynomial Space). Keywords: Computational complexity, the theory of equality, the coding of computations, simulation by means formulae, polynomial time, polynomial space, lower complexity bound

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ivan V. Latkin. 2021-07-04. The complexity of the first-order theory of pure equality. https://doi.org/10.32523/2077-9879-2022-13-1-44-68

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO