SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1907.06983

Lossless Prioritized Embeddings

Abstract

Given metric spaces $(X,d)$ and $(Y,\rho)$ and an ordering $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n$ of $(X,d)$, an embedding $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is said to have a prioritized distortion $\alpha(\cdot)$, if for any pair $x_j,x'$ of distinct points in $X$, the distortion provided by $f$ for this pair is at most $\alpha(j)$. If $Y$ is a normed space, the embedding is said to have prioritized dimension $\beta(\cdot)$, if $f(x_j)$ may have nonzero entries only in its first $\beta(j)$ coordinates. The notion of prioritized embedding was introduced by \cite{EFN15}, where a general methodology for constructing such embeddings was developed. Though this methodology enables \cite{EFN15} to come up with many prioritized embeddings, it typically incurs some loss in the distortion. This loss is problematic for isometric embeddings. It is also troublesome for Matousek's embedding of general metrics into $\ell_\infty$, which for a parameter $k = 1,2,\ldots$, provides distortion $2k-1$ and dimension $O(k \log n \cdot n^{1/k})$. In this paper we devise two lossless prioritized embeddings. The first one is an isometric prioritized embedding of tree metrics into $\ell_\infty$ with dimension $O(\log j)$. The second one is a prioritized Matousek's embedding of general metrics into $\ell_\infty$, which provides prioritized distortion $2 \lceil k {{\log j} \over {\log n}} \rceil - 1$ and dimension $O(k \log n \cdot n^{1/k})$, again matching the worst-case guarantee $2k-1$ in the distortion of the classical Matousek's embedding. We also provide a dimension-prioritized variant of Matousek's embedding. Finally, we devise prioritized embeddings of general metrics into (single) ultra-metric and of general graphs into (single) spanning tree with asymptotically optimal distortion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michael Elkin, Ofer Neiman. 2019-07-16. Lossless Prioritized Embeddings. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06983

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS