SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1907.11402

New $(\alpha,\beta)$ Spanners and Hopsets

Abstract

An $f(d)$-spanner of an unweighted $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E)$ is a subgraph $H$ satisfying that $dist_H(u, v)$ is at most $f(dist_G(u, v))$ for every $u,v \in V$. We present new spanner constructions that achieve a nearly optimal stretch of $O(\lceil k /d \rceil)$ for any distance value $d \in [1,k^{1-o(1)}]$, and $d \geq k^{1+o(1)}$. We show the following: 1. There exists an $f(d)$-spanner $H \subseteq G$ with $f(d)\leq 7k$ for any $d \in [1,\sqrt{k}/2]$ with expected size $O_{k}(n^{1+1/k})$. This in particular gives $(\alpha,\beta)$ spanners with $\alpha=O(\sqrt{k})$ and $\beta=O(k)$. 2. For any $\epsilon \in (0,1/2]$, there exists an $(\alpha,\beta)$-spanner with $\alpha=O(k^{\epsilon})$, $\beta=O_{\epsilon}(k)$ and of expected size $O_{k}(n^{1+1/k})$. This implies a stretch of $O(\lceil k/d \rceil)$ for any $d \in [\sqrt{k}/2, k^{1-\epsilon}]$, and for every $d\geq k^{1+\epsilon}$. In particular, it provides a constant stretch already for vertex pairs at distance $k^{1+o(1)}$ (improving upon $d=(\log k)^{\log k}$ that was known before). Up to the $o(1)$ factor in the exponent, and the constant factor in the stretch, this is the best possible by the girth argument. 3. For any $\epsilon \in (0,1)$ and integer $k\geq 1$, there is a $(3+\epsilon, \beta)$-spanner with $\beta=O_{\epsilon}(k^{\log(3+8/\epsilon)})$ and $O_{k,\epsilon}(n^{1+1/k})$ edges. We also consider the related graph concept of hopsets introduced by [Cohen, J. ACM '00]. We present a new family of $(\alpha,\beta)$ hopsets with $\widetilde{O}(k \cdot n^{1+1/k})$ edges and $\alpha \cdot \beta=O(k)$. Most notably, we show a construction of $(3+\epsilon,\beta)$ hopset with $\widetilde{O}_{k,\epsilon}(n^{1+1/k})$ edges and hop-bound of $\beta=O_{\epsilon}(k^{\log(3+9/\epsilon)})$, improving upon the state-of-the-art hop-bound of $\beta=O(\log k /\epsilon)^{\log k}$ by [Elkin-Neiman, '17] and [Huang-Pettie, '17].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Uri Ben-Levy, Merav Parter. 2019-07-26. New $(\alpha,\beta)$ Spanners and Hopsets. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11402

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS