SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 1908.03249

Pairwise Rational Points on a Parabola

Abstract

This paper presents a solution to the following open problem in Number Theory and Geometry: How many points can you find on the (half) parabola $y=x^2$, $x>0$, so that the distance between any pair of them is rational? This problem sounds like a geometry problem, but it is likely to require techniques in number theory. That's because, to determine if the distance between (a,b) and (s,t) is rational, you need to test whether $(a-s)^2$ + $(b-t)^2$ is the square of a rational number...and such questions typically fall into the realm of number theory. Of course, since this is an open problem, no-one can claim to know just what field the problem lies in, since no-one knows the solution. I believe it is not even known if there are more than 5 points on the parabola which satisfy the condition. It is certainly not known if there is an infinite family with pairwise rational distances. We can quickly see that there are three such points in the following way: Pick two rational numbers, say 1/5 and 3/5, and let those be the distances between the pairs of points AB and BC. If you fix those distances and slide the points up the parabola, the distance AC will gradually increase, bounded above by 4/5. Since the rational numbers are dense in the reals, there will be many placements of the points so that AC is a rational distance. It is not too hard to show that if you have N points on the parabola with rational distances between them, then you can find N points on the parabola with integer distances between them. This problem is publicly posted on the DIMACS mathematical research website in order to search for solutions. This paper demonstrates that an infinite number of families each containing an arbitrarily large number of such pairwise rational points on the parabola can be found. A constructive algorithm for doing so is outlined in the paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kyle Bomeisl. 2019-07-30. Pairwise Rational Points on a Parabola. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.03249

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO